- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, consensus is that notability is not established here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:15, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Shoke Xerabadi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to demonstrate Wikipedia:Notability. Pahlevun (talk) 10:37, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 28. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:57, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete A Google search gives mostly mirrors and forks of Wikipedia. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:05, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:30, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:30, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Only a paramilitary unknown.--SaməkTalk 09:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as still nothing actually suggestive of establishing the necessary substance. SwisterTwister talk 04:52, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- does not suggest notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:52, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Searches found no sources. Article has no sources. Gab4gab (talk) 18:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.