Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shantanu Bagchi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:43, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shantanu Bagchi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would've PRODded this as it appears non-notable aside from the fact it says he won several awards in India so I'm not sure if these can be supported; all my searches found absolutely nothing and there's not much in the article as it is. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:38, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:18, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per nom. Searches revealed nothing which would show this person met notability criteria. Other than brief mentions and press releases (and very few of those), there was very little. I found one article, which mentions a person of this same name, but since this fact isn't mentioned in the article, I wonder if it is the same person. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete maker of advertising films, and non notable. Nominations are not awards. I am very reluctant to judge film in India by sourcing, because I understand it's notorious that Indian newspapers require payment for film articles and reviews. Too what extent this extends to other subjects I'm unsure of, but if we are to cover that country at all, the assumptions behind WP:GNG do not work here--possible almost no sources are actually RS for notability as we use the expression. DGG ( talk ) 23:19, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.