Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seyed Masoud Noori

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seyed Masoud Noori

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough! Sahehco (talk) 09:08, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

–––– — Preceding unsigned comment added by San1373 (talk • contribs) 20:15, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The man is a well-known international scholar, co-founder of the first ever legal clinic in Iran and a current researcher at New York University. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F470:6:2004:4514:14CD:868D:8DC5 (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 02:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable. Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:40, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly not notable. Adityavagarwal (talk) 08:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 18:27, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.