Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven-dots glyph
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn with a red face, but I really did do the search! Dougweller (talk) 19:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Seven-dots glyph (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
With all due respect to the article's creator, I can't find any sources using this as a descriptive category (or in fact in any other way), so this is WP:OR. I searched using various permutations. Dougweller (talk) 15:12, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I can. It was dead easy. They were cited in the article. The book by Jeremy Black and Anthony Green cited in the References section of this article has an entry for "seven dots" on page 162. Uncle G (talk) 16:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- And now when I search for "seven dots" I find that and a couple of other entries. I despair. Mind you, it worked the other way for me this morning, someone said a certain search only showed up maybe hundred entries, I did the exact same search and found about 700. I'll withdraw this. 19:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.