Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saskia Maarleveld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:50, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Saskia Maarleveld

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:ENT Small roles in dubbed cartoons, and one video game. The audio book award is not notable. Sources are almost all credit lists, with one industry related article and a personal interview. Per WP:TOOSOON - needs major roles, or a major award, or significant coverage. Scr★pIron^IV 19:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC) Scr★pIron^IV 19:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The only major role I've seen so far is Bloom in Winx Club, so I'm having trouble trying to show how this would meet WP:ENT. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The role is Tecna. And I can add more links. Is that a good deal?--Maxie1hoi (talk) 18:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Techna, whatever. Doesn't matter. That's just one starring role. That's not enough to keep her around. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as her list is certainly not outstandingly convincing and there's nothing to suggest the better notability improvements, not for WP:GNG or WP:ENTERTAINER. SwisterTwister talk 04:31, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 04:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As above - no references of note Deathlibrarian (talk) 05:50, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:57, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of notable roles. ZettaComposer (talk) 11:55, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete my sweeps such as this one did not find much.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.