Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samte Khoda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The clearly canvassed SPAs were not about to mount a cohesive, P&G-based argument to counter that of the Delete views. Owen× 00:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samte Khoda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, I do not find WP:SIGCOV demonstrating that it is a notable TV show. Created by user to build credibility for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Najmeddin Shariati Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 14:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article is significant because it is about one of the most popular television programs of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting Organization, which has been running since 2009.
Please remove it from the removal list
Thanks
Please see this article (IRIB TV3) for verification
The name of the TV show Samte Khoda is mentioned in it M.sharaki (talk) 17:31, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 15:59, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Since several "votes"/opinions are either duplicates or from very new editors (or both), I'd welcome participation from some of our AFD regulars who are more familiar with notability guidelines.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, especially given the failure to find any WP:SIGCOV with WP:DEPTH by other editors.
Allan Nonymous (talk) 18:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closer: Above (and many others) are SPA. Maybe even SOCKS. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 07:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.