Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saffron Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Saffron Taylor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Saffron Taylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source in the article I could actually verify is Citynet, & that's not enough.Google New sources are about other people with that name; additional ones in Google are either publicity or not helpful. Given the way Google works, the most prominent source advertising her is Wikipedia DGG ( talk ) 16:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

• Delete The name sounds familiar but when you can’t verify anything then what’s the point of an article? Trillfendi (talk) 17:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Fails WP:NMODEL. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 17:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. Per norm, there practically nothing from GNEWS to ascertain WP:RS. Fails WP:NMODEL. Lapablo (talk) 20:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.