Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SNAC Shareholders Committee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SNAC Shareholders Committee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost totally unsourced WP:OR, doesn't meet our new notability guidelines Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:35, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article about a not independently notable subject for failing to at least hide their original work. -The Gnome (talk) 09:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notable subject - this format is for the first time being put to a RBS PLC AGM this year and with likely HM Treasury Approval. This is a first for the entire UK. It may not in your eyes be notable because it is not main stream press however reading the Tomorrows Company report on Shareholder Nomination to the AGM committees circa 50 pages or going through a couple of thousand pages of Corporate Governance text will not get you very far "as its unwanted by CEOs" quote Chris Philp MP UK Parliament. This is my first mainstream published wiki article on something that will have a far greater effect than a bird listing. Changes will effect UK society and world governance of PLC's and capitalism. Sure its not a perfect article but so far there is nothing on Wikipedia. Please edit it with your knowledge. Be reminded that there is also no consistent composition of a Shareholders Committee otherwise called a Shareholders Nomination to the AGM Committee. I have excluded my award for best conference paper held in the Houses of Parliaments Corporate Governance Conference and many more for brevity etc which had a new twist on its composition. SOURCES HOW MANY DO YOU NEED? Given the wide ranging effect this needs something and who else is going to make it. Sure I could add another 20 newspaper articles and mentions but why? It only got large because I thought it was published but it was still in my sandbox. Perhaps in the quick read you didn't read the long papers below linking to the related documents, the most recent newspaper article. Sadly I contributed and informed others of the idea who have since run with it and I didn't come up with the idea that was someone from the Swedish Association. Read the recent Press Release with the same four major published papers on it. Perhaps you didn't go to the source of articles or the organisations ShareSoc and UKSA. 2A02:A44E:67A3:1:19A3:74F2:4EB0:73D1 (talk) 11:57, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the article is not ready yet, e.g. what does SNAC stand for. There should be some online refs - not just "sources" listed - certainly there have to be independent sources that mention SNAC. So, if I were to !vote I'd have say Delete (not yet). But please get the refs for SNAC (not just the concept of shareholder activism), and fix up the article in your sandbox. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 03:27, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shareholder Nomination to the Agm Committee is the first letters of the main words. Director Cliff Weight of ShareSoc thought SNARC. I was recommended by the Swedes to add in the 'Nomination to the AGM' part as otherwise people listen to it as just a meeting of shareholders yet it has the Chairman. Also the CEOs when they hear Nomination to the AGM get what the committee 'could do' because the four shareholders collectively have more than 5% shareholding to put a resolution forward or 100 members willing to get shares and sign the forms. Anyway what needs to be changed or removed to improve it. Shall I lengthen the title? Winsome P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A44E:67A3:1:EC65:8108:38F3:FFB9 (talk) 16:06, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also realise that the title is a bit stupid having the initials to start. The title should of been Shareholder Nomination to the AGM Committee (SNAC) or Shareholder Committee. Sorry but it wont change for me does it need a copy of what it is removing and then republishing all together? Winsome P — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winsome P (talk • contribs) 16:12, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a great idea either to write an article without reading any guidance eg Wikipedia:Your first article. that title still doesn't conform to Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Please read our guidance, don't just dump your random thoughts here Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete suggest the article creator seeks assistance from WP:AfC. Szzuk (talk) 12:40, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.