Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ripstik (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to RazorUSA. And protect from recreation. Sandstein 05:51, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ripstik

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product already covered adequately by caster board. This article has previously been redirected to caster board and I suggest that the article is deleted and the redirect established. I did this but as an editor reverted I am bringing it to AfD instead. Furthermore, little has changed since the original AfD, which resulted in deletion and redirect to caster board. Biker Biker (talk) 11:12, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as per the first AFD and move/create-protect against further disruption. ArcAngel (talk) ) 12:33, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If redirected, the target should be RazorUSA, which now has an article. Redirecting a brand name to a type of product should be avoided, as it implies that the target should contain a list of brands or manufacturers. Peter E. James (talk) 12:45, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. — —Tom Morris (talk) 11:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.