- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 17:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Reel cinerose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod that was removed-non notable film company with just short films for youtube. Wgolf (talk) 21:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- I support the deletion of this article and it's linked articles. They're all self-referential and not particularly noteworthy. No other articles reference this company or its films. --PureRED (talk) 21:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - no notability; pure promotion —МандичкаYO 😜 22:20, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete While this little company exists, simply producing films and having no coverage is a failure of WP:N. Schmidt, Michael Q. 03:23, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, Michael Q. 08:08, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, Michael Q. 08:10, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Per MichaelQSchmidt. VandVictory (talk) 09:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.