Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Bull Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. redcirects don't requiore afds but this is inadequately sourced Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:16, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Red Bull Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any third party reliable sources to confirm notability. The Page says it is a subsidiary of red bull, but again, no verification for that. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:06, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge-no references, and google only seems to find the red bull site, twitter and youtube. At best, it warrants a section of the Red Bull article. He iro 01:16, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing notable here Brookie :) - he's in the building somewhere! ^(Whisper...) 09:58, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - [1] confirms that RBR is not some whacky trademark violation, I think, if that's what you mean by wp:V. It sure seems like the subject is not notable enough for a stand-alone article, but I think a redirect plus a small note at Red Bull about this unit to satisfy WP:REDIRECT#PLA is reasonable. ErikHaugen (talk) 21:22, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect - Aside from ErikHaugen's reference, I couldn't find any other independent and reliable sources to verify notability. If this is a legit label, it might be worth adding to the Red Bull wiki page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Artlovesyou (talk • contribs) 04:51, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.