Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Re Conegrade Ltd

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re Conegrade Ltd

edit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Re Conegrade Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not seem to be an important court decision, and the sourcing available is very thin. Though I can find a smattering of passing mentions in footnotes here and there, there's nothing anywhere to suggest this trial has had any real lasting importance in setting precedent or establishing legal principles. Reyk YO! 10:47, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This nominator is incorrect. Yes, it's only a little High Court case, but it's cited as important in a host of important text and practitioner books: https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q="Re Conegrade Ltd" Fundamentally, every case is a precedent, and potentially important. Wikidea 13:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On fence. The article as it stands gives no explanation of notability, nothing about where it was used as a precedent, etc. Deb (talk) 18:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:47, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • If it helps, I got someone to check and it was applied as a precedent in Oxford Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Re; Wilson v Masters International Ltd [2009] according to Lexis Library, and mentioned in Cosy Seal Insulation Ltd (In Administation), Re[a] and Wilson v Masters International Ltd[b] according to Westlaw. Westlaw also lists it as being cited or mentioned in two journal articles,[c][d] and also in two books.[e][f] I made sure to get printout of both if anyone needs them. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:51, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ Cosy Seal Insulation Ltd (In Administation), Re [2016] EWHC 1255 (Ch); [2016] 2 B.C.L.C. 319; CHD; 02 June 2016
  2. ^ Wilson v Masters International Ltd [2009] EWHC 1753 (Ch); [2010] B.C.C. 834; [2009] 2 B.C.L.C. 485; [2010] B.P.I.R. 608; Ch D; 10 July 2009
  3. ^ The Re Duomatic principle and sections 320-322 of the Companies Act 1985. Asset sales; Consent; Directors; Formalities; Liquidation; Shareholders. J.B.L. 2004, Jan, 121-129
  4. ^ Substantial property transaction involving company directors. Companies; Directors; Liquidation; Shareholders. I.L. & P. 2003, 19(2), 57
  5. ^ McPherson's Law of Company Liquidation 4th Ed. Chapter: Chapter 11 - Assets Available for Division and Distribution. Documents: 9. - The need to establish desire to produce preferential effect.
  6. ^ Sealy & Milman: Annotated Guide to Insolvency Legislation 20th Ed. - 2017. Chapter: Insolvency Act 1986. Documents: 239: Preferences (England and Wales).
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:35, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Re_Conegrade_Ltd&oldid=850193586"