Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raghunath Singh Thakur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 01:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Raghunath Singh Thakur

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any reliable sources with significant coverage. The article does not cite any (one link is just a listing mentioning him, the other is not independent). Google News search returns no results for "Raghunath Singh Thakur" [1]. It does return a few for "R. S. Thakur"[2], but it seams that those are not about the same person. Google Books search returns few hits for "Raghunath Singh Thakur"[3], but it seams that those are about some prince. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I had hoped the creator had some material to back up his claims. It is, after all, his autobiography. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO. Not enough, or really any, coverage in reliable sources to verify and sustain an article. The claim for discovering Artemisinin is not supported by our article which says "[Artemisinin] was discovered by Tu Youyou, a Chinese scientist, who was awarded half of the 2015 Nobel Prize in Medicine for her discovery." Acording to GScholar his work is not highly cited so he fails WP:PROF. Jbh ^Talk 23:05, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I was wondering how this showed up at AfD. I thought I had an active BLPPROD on it. Turns out the author, User:R S Thakur1, created several of these including Ram Simha Thakur which exipred today [4] and Dr R S Thakur which was speedied. This is obviously shameless self promotion. Jbh^Talk 20:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, at least those two were about a different R S Thakur,[5] of LIT. Perhaps they were added in order to disambiguate that R S Thakur from this one at CIMAP. – Fayenatic London 23:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I removed the PROD from this page, thinking that the award tended to indicate notability, and that the claimed work on artemisinin sounded important. Searching for Thakur & artemisinin confirms that he did publish some papers on the subject, but I did not see any that refer to him by name in the text as having made notable advances; they merely cited his research. Although he was head of CIMAP, that does not appear to be a "major academic institution", so his directorship does not establish criterion 6 at WP:ACADEMIC. – Fayenatic London 23:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Just a WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY, with few sources to back up claims on a quick search. As a BLP, this would be a big problem. ~ NottNott talk|contrib 11:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- For the record, the article's creator has identified himself as Ravindranath Singh Thakur (note: different first name), and denied that this article was about himself.[6] – Fayenatic London 13:43, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fail WP:NOTE. Lack of significant secondary source coverage independent of the subject himself. — Cirt (talk) 07:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.