- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:25, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Raccoo-oo-oon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Orphan article about band that doesn't seem to have released anything on a notable label, mostly cassettes and such. Geschichte (talk) 09:56, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 13:25, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - 2.4 million google hits. Since the band dissolved in 2008, it is not likely to become more notable with time. Racepacket (talk) 14:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ummm ... not sure what the 2.4 million google hits has to do w/the delete vote ...--Epeefleche (talk) 07:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems to me that Racepacket would rather delete, but the 2.4M hits make it a weak case --Glantrischmozzle (talk) 09:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's 220,000 when you exclude Wikipedia. Google's estimates are very buggy. • Anakin (talk) 05:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems to me that Racepacket would rather delete, but the 2.4M hits make it a weak case --Glantrischmozzle (talk) 09:22, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article cites Tiny Mix Tapes, Drowned in Sound, and, now, Allmusic, as well as other reviews. Significant press coverage. Chubbles (talk) 20:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per Chubbles. Joe Chill (talk) 22:21, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep the reviews of their work seem to nudge it into compliance with WP:N. ThemFromSpace 23:31, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- observation re the reviews - at least two of those are dead links. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Per Chubbles.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:50, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: There are multiple reliable 3rd part sources. Notability is established. Suede67 (talk) 07:03, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep WP:BAND conditions do seem to have been fulfilled. --Glantrischmozzle (talk) 09:27, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.