Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quarantine (2000 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 09:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quarantine (2000 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television film; Fails WP:NFO, WP:NFSOURCES and WP:SIGCOV. Found no reliable sources/reviews in a WP:BEFORE. The Film Creator (talk) 19:53, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found nothing that shows notability. SL93 (talk) 02:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting a Hamlin movie? You will be sued by HHM. Joke aside, I found this and this which don't seem to cut it. Geschichte (talk) 10:58, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – The Grid (talk) 21:47, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The film was notable back then but over time the popularity died out. No reliable sources and failes WP:NFO. HelpingWorld (talk) 02:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.