Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuadFusion technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

QuadFusion technology

appears to be utterly non-notable. I prod'd it, it was removed with the explanation "removing deletion tag". There's not enough redeeming quality to the article itself to overcome the fact that it is non-notable i kan reed 17:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. "Still in its infancy", not yet notable. Badbilltucker 17:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination and Badbilltucker.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 17:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it's tasty, tasty spam. WilyD 18:00, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.