Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerSteering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. and redirect to Power steering ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PowerSteering

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, non-notable, and apparently undeclared paid editing. The refs are almost entirely notes about funding, which is never enough to justify an article. The others are newspaper articles clearly based on press releases, which are therefore indiscriminate and not reliable. The history of the article shows the blatant promotional intent DGG ( talk ) 18:57, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Voicing the nominator DGG. Promotional article which lacks notability.–Celestina007 (talk) 21:14, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Power steering? AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 20:30, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:10, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Power steering. A quick Google search shows that sometimes power-steering is rendered without the dash, [1][2] and the capitalization for the second word is a natural one. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 05:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose you mean "Delete and redirect" because there is no reason to preserve the present content in the page history behind the redirect DGG ( talk ) 05:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.