Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perplex City Stories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Perplex City. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:39, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perplex City Stories

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's zero RS talking about this. All sources on article now are primary. Only one I could find was [1] which does not sufficiently establish passing WP:GNG Soni (talk) 18:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Games. Soni (talk) 18:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Perplex City per WP:ATD. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that there's nothing in the article to really merge. It's a planned video game that never actually happened. All plot and similar details are unsourced or come from primary sources. The only thing worth noting here is that "This was planned and didn't happen" and maybe whatever we can scrounge off the Engadget interview I found (The interview isn't actually used in the article yet).

So we can theoretically close it as a merge, but it's effectively a deletion. There's nothing worth saving, (nearly?) everything's already in the Perplex City article. Soni (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In that case redirect rather than merge. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.