Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulina Sarkanaitė

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 12:31, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paulina Sarkanaitė (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject, a Lithuanian women's footballer, has not received sufficient coverage to meet WP:GNG. The closest thing to WP:SIGCOV I found was this. Otherwise, it's all passing mentions (1, 2, 3, etc.) JTtheOG (talk) 23:50, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That source (a YouTube video produced by a football club) is neither reliable nor independent so contributes nothing towards notability. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That source is not from the club, nor has anything to do with it. It's a reupload. Original source is the Lithuanian radio TAU. Respublik (talk) 17:21, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On a further analysis, the part from 00:00 to 00:05 is by the club. All the remaining content (00:06-23:48) is a reupload from an independent source as stated above. Respublik (talk) 22:15, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't speak Lithuanian but it sounds like a direct interview with the player herself. Anything coming directly out of the player's own mouth will be non-independent. We need an article built on what people in the media are saying about her not what she says about herself. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 23:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.