Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul (Prem) Sobel
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Paul (Prem) Sobel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
bio lacking notability. lacks coverage in independent reliable sources, mostly by Sobel, primary sources or passing mentions. original research. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:46, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:45, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:45, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:16, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:07, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was unable to find anything to back up notability of Sobel. I've seen many of his works on PubMed and Google Books, but that is not enough for notability. — ΛΧΣ21™ 03:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.