Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Spears Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP Esprit15d • talk • contribs 21:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Patricia Spears Jones

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - poet who does not appear to pass either WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. The Pushcart Prize nomination seemed at first like it might be sufficient but it turns out that up to six people can be nominated by a single publisher, so a nomination by itself isn't that prestigious. Subject is mentioned in reliable sources but does not have the significant coverage required by the guideline. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 19:36, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - based on a google book searches, her work has been included in a variety of anthologies, and is included in various works of literary crticism. [1], [2], [3], [4]. -- Whpq (talk) 14:41, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.Lionel (talk) 00:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The books found by Whpq and these reviews of the subject's work demonstrate notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Tag as a stub. Sufficient achievement to merit inclusion. Carrite (talk) 16:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Separate book publications with reputable publishers and widely anthologized. Certainly notable--ShelfSkewed Talk 20:26, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep wasnt sure until i saw review found by phil bridger from nyt. that, combined with at least one book published by coffee house (legit publisher), is just enough for me.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 08:52, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.