Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parikalpna Award

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ignoring single-purpose accounts, consensus was to delete the article. Secret ^account 04:38, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Parikalpna Award

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find anything remotely notable about this award on web. It's mostly Wikipedia's mirror sites and such. One source South Asia Today has covered press releases of events related to this award [1] [2]. Both articles are authored by a certain "Nazia Rizavi". The award is instituted by a Hindi-language author Ravindra Prabhat and in one of the AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindi Blogging ka Itihas, we established how User:Naziah rizvi and User:Mala chaubey have WP:COI with Mr. Prabhat. Hence requesting deletion for failure to meet notability WP:GNG and using WP for promotion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:40, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Keep- This page was nominated for deletion on October 27, 2012 in Hindi wikipedia. the result of discussions Was KEEP.Naziah rizvi (talk) 09:21, 7 October 2014 (UTC)— Naziah rizvi (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Comment: I have not contribute this page, but I am reporter of the event of 2013 in kathmandu (nepal)Naziah rizvi (talk) 09:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What happens on other wikis has nothing to do here. That's no valid reason to keep the article. And you have contributed to Prabhat's article and probably have contributed to other related articles on other wikis too. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 12:13, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- I think many reliable sources.Moudul hasan (talk) 12:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)— Moudul hasan (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Hasan, this is your 6th edit on WP and many of your edits after this have been "Delete per above" and "Keep per above" types. We are not here to count your votes. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:04, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Moudul hasan. Subject is notable. Improve the article if necessary, do not delete.Mala chaubey (talk) 13:32, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article lacks reliable sources. Only reliable sources for me are two offline newspaper article. Online version of HT article doesn't support the cited fact, which anyhow is not related to establishing notability. Rest of the sources are either self-published or blogs. --Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 03:32, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Vigyani: * citations: Information available related to the subject of several important newspapers, as-

:::Others offline newspapers article:

In Eng.-

Hindustan Times, Eng Daily,Lucknow Addition,Date : 08th Aug. 2012, page No. 01, Feature Title : Calling for a code for net effect
The Pioneer,Eng Daily, 28th Aug. 2012, Page No. 02, News Title : Bloggers Discuss need for setting up Blog Akademi
Hindustan Times, Eng. Daily, Lucknow Edition, Date : 08th Aug. 2012, page No. 01, Feature Title : Calling for a code for net effect
Indian Express, Eng. Daily, 5th May 2011, Page No. 03, Author: Sanjib Kumar Roy, Title : 4 year old from Andamans toast of Blogging World
I next, Eng. Daily, 28th Aug. 2012, Page No. 05, News Title : Government regulation not needed
The Hitavada, Eng. Daily,Jabbalpur Edition, 6th May 2011, Page No. 02, News Title : Uttaranchal CM felicitated City writer Girish Billore

In Hindi-

सद्भावना दर्पण,हिन्दी मासिक,रायपुर (छतीसगढ़),जून-2011, पृष्ठ संख्या : 29, समाचार शीर्षक : दिल्ली में इक्यावन हिन्दी ब्लॉगरों का सम्मान (in Hindi)
पंजाब केसरी, हिन्दी दैनिक,दिल्ली संस्कारण,03 मायी 2011,पृष्ठ संख्या : 09, समाचार शीर्षक : ब्लोगिंग अभिव्यक्ति का एक सशक्त माध्यम : निशंक (in Hindi)
हिंदुस्तान, हिन्दी दैनिक, लखनऊ संस्कारण,दिनांक : 28 अगस्त 2012,प्रेष्ठ संख्या :07, समाचार शीर्षक : सम्मानित हुये ब्लॉगर (in Hindi)
राष्ट्रीय सहारा, हिन्दी दैनिक,28 अगस्त 2012,लखनऊ संस्कारण,पृष्ठ संख्या : 07, समाचार शीर्षक : इतिहास बनेगा ब्लॉगर सम्मेलन, देश विदेश से आए 51 साहित्यकारों और मीडिया कर्मियों को परिकल्पना सम्मान (in Hindi)
दैनिक भास्कर,राष्ट्रीय संस्कारण,नयी दिल्ली,दिनांक :29 अप्रैल 2011,लेखक : पीयूष पाण्डेय, आलेख शीर्षक : हिन्दी ब्लॉग सम्मेलन के बहाने (in Hindi)
जनसंदेश टाइम्स,राष्ट्रीय हिन्दी दैनिक, लखनऊ संस्कारण,08 मई 2011, पृष्ठ संख्या-3, स्तंभ: ब्लॉग लोक, शीर्षक : परिकल्पना ब्लोगोत्सव: अभिव्यक्ति का दिव्य समारोह (in Hindi) Thanks.Mala chaubey (talk) 07:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see above Links, Notes, references and give natural justice to this page.Mala chaubey (talk) 06:45, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 10:28, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect I would support a redirect to Ravindra Prabhat until we have enough reliable citations. Bladesmulti (talk) 17:21, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~Lack of~~ Inadequate numbers of WP:RS. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:53, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Guye - There are reliable citations, but having them is probably not enough, at least here it is not. Bladesmulti (talk) 03:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. We likely need a Hindi-speaking closer to check the above links. If they are not reliable or do not describe the award, the article should be deleted.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:13, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter- I agree with you sir, but as per discussion of Hindi wikipedia. Subject is notable. This subject was nominated for deletion on October 27, 2012 in Hindi wikipedia. the result of discussions Was KEEP. Mala chaubey (talk) 10:51, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is irrelevant. May be in the Hindi Wikipedia POV pushers outnumbered, I do not know.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:26, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter- sir, I took part in the debate of hindi wikipedia and I know that the discussion is based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.Mala chaubey (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.