- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Paizley Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Possible Fancruft for unnotable actress.Ra2007 (talk) 22:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 23:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Easily meets WP:BIO's "additional criteria" section: "Has won or been a serious nominee for a well-known award, such as those listed in Category:Adult movie awards or Category:Film awards". Article currently lists her as being nominated for 8 awards over 6 years. Tabercil (talk) 23:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Tabercil is correct, subject easily meets additional criteria. Article is reasonably sourced. This seems like a pretty bizarre nomination. Horrorshowj (talk) 23:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Coverage in reliable secondary sources is exceptionally trivial. Valrith (talk) 21:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I never heard of her but did some searching. She seems notable enough due to awards and some other coverage. I am an established user but I'm too embarrassed to edit this AFD under my username because this is a porn AFD. My real username starts with con and quite a few letters after that. I do not normally look at porn but was curious when I saw this AFD. Conpornafd (talk) 02:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Rename. The problem with this article is that "Paizley Adams" isn't her main stage name. It's "Cassidey". That redirects to this article, but I think it should be the other way around. Articles for Cassidey:
- Cassidey Ready for Vivid Comeback [1] [2] a bunch of related articles on Adult Video News
- Enrique Iglesias teams with a porn star for his new video; Enrique Iglesias' sexed-up music video may have been nixed Entertainment Week (also Rolling Stone, but that's a more trivial note)
- Interview with Xcitement magazine
- Cassidey Goes to the Head of the Class with NYC's Top-Rated WNEW-FM Radio Show "Opie & Anthony"
- Babes and Stuff interview - not proof of notability per se, but some more info
- and in addition to the nominations, I think that's sufficient. I don't normally like just nominations as proof of notability, but she has gotten 8 over 6 years, that's not trivial. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 18:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - "Fancruft" isn't a criteria for deletion. Notability is a valid criteria, but as others have noted, this seems to meet notability criteria. This does seem to be a somewhat bizarre nomination. I feel silly that I'm even discussing this. --Mdwyer (talk) 07:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.