Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outline of Big Science

Previous AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Topic outline of Big Science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Outline of Big Science

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sufficiently broad or well-defined for an outline. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:19, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The vagueness of the term "Big Science" translates to a vagueness of the area this outline is supposed to cover, and this list does not seem to be serving a useful navigational purpose. XOR'easter (talk) 17:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don’t see what this is really adding to Big Science, which already covers the topic. Any elements missing from that article can just be added in directly rather than added to this outline. Mccapra (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.