Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osman hajy marouf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ~~delete~~ delete Osman hajy marouf, and no consensus with leave to speedily renominate for Worker–Communist Party of Kurdistan. Tim Song (talk) 01:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC) amended, Tim Song (talk) 02:42, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Osman hajy marouf

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Minor politician. The reference inserted in deprodding is a Wikipedia mirror. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 15:08, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating:

for which only a trivial reference was provided by the creator. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 15:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep both. Party leaders and national political parties are usually notable. This is the Google News archive search for his other name, Amjad Ghafur. This is a Google search for his Arabic name. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CTJF83 chat 04:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Osman Hajy Marouf. Three weeks listed and this is still a BLP with only two sources: one plonks his name in a list; the other doesn't seem to mention him at all and in any case is obviously an unreliable source. This presented by Eastmain appears merely incidental. The Arabic-script sources he/she then provides are just a google list: the reliability of the sources has not been established, nor is it anywhere near clear to what extent the subject is covered by the sources. This BLP is therefore nowhere near passing WP:BIO (or WP:POLITICIAN which also applies). Its retention is totally contrary to policy. --Mkativerata (talk) 02:15, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.