Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orna Datz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. This does not prevent an editorial decision to merge or redirect in the future. Stifle (talk) 08:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orna Datz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Thoroughly fails WP:NBIO. Not a single source is cited, and it is poorly formatted. QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 07:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Film, Music, Television, Entertainment, Asia, Middle East, and Israel. QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 07:27, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Unsourced WP:BLP. Possible redirect or merge to article Duo Datz shoudl should sufficient sources be found. scope_creep^Talk 14:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge completely and with positive prejudice into Duo Datz. Both the nomination and the sole reaction are based on false assumptions and disregard the golden WP:NEXIST rule. As such, these should be completely discounted. Does that mean that the article should be kept? Not necessarily. The article is so short that all its contents can be merged into Duo Datz without creating any concern of WP:UNDUE. This recommendation reflects the length of the article and is not a statement of Datz's notability, which she passes at the greatest of ease. If someone wants to create a more developed article on "Datza" later on, they are very welcome to do so! gidonb (talk) 18:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, there were numerous articles from the Israeli major media outlets from the 80th and 90th when her fame was at its peak. Tzahy (talk) 11:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - she won 3rd place at the Eurovision Song Contest 1991 per 1. There is probably enough coverage to support her notability for article inclusion, such as 2, 3, 4, 5. - Indefensible (talk) 06:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Hebrew article on the subject also has a lot more coverage and references which can be translated for improving this article. - Indefensible (talk) 06:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:42, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Duo Datz. Notable as a member of Duo Datz only. That article has been greatly expanded and covers most, if not all, aspects of this individual's notable endeavors. It even contains a section on her personal life. This bio article duplicates much of the duo's article without the context. Grk1011 (talk) 13:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at the Hebrew article, there seems to be a lot more than just the Duo Datz stuff. - Indefensible (talk) 15:16, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Indefensible: Hmmm... Maybe I can translate the article to English, as I am a native Hebrew speaker. QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 14:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly would be a good candidate for translation, I think she meets for inclusion per my vote earlier. - Indefensible (talk) 19:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

'Comment I spoke to QuickQuokka. The editor is not going to do the work. So its a merge. Most of the article is already in the expanded Duo Datz. scope_creep^Talk 06:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So if you think it should be a merge, that means your prior vote for delete is struck, right? But if there is known material which could be used for expansion, then we should actually keep the article with a translation request. - Indefensible (talk) 01:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.