Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Dormouse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:12, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Dormouse

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unable to find WP:RS refs for this on Google or Google News. Trine Day is a notoriously unreliable publishing house, the other references are blogs. The pdf from GWU completely fails to mention "Operation Dormouse" anywhere at all. [UseTheCommandLine ~/talk] #_ 04:03, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - obscure to the point of non-notability. Bearian (talk) 23:13, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 09:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There do not seem to be any Reliable Sources about this supposed project. There's not even enough evidence to warrant a redirect to Project ARTICHOKE. BTW if the article is kept, the references to Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld should be deleted; there is no valid sourcing for the accusation against them, so it violates BLP. --MelanieN (talk) 03:36, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.