Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!: Part 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!: The Movie. Daniel (talk) 02:51, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!: Part 2

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally moved to draft space but was recreated in main space, fails WP:NFILM, no good results came from WP:BEFORE. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 01:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Philippines. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 01:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think it should be a Keep (nominations at Metro FilmFest (or here)) but if it really seems it cannot be be improved then redirect to Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!: The Movie, also discussed for deletion -MY, OH MY! (mushy yank) 10:50, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, same reason as I mentioned in the AFD for this movie's Part 1. --- Tito Pao (talk) 14:50, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Okay Ka, Fairy Ko! franchise. It's a 41st FAMAS awardee film but there's little material to work with online. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:NFILM per above arguments. SBKSPP (talk) 01:49, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: See relisting statement for Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!: The Movie .
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This film premiered in 1992. Google Newspaper archive has copies of the Manila Standard from this period. Other people have written articles such as 1993 Bataan gubernatorial recall election and the infamous (1991) UAAP Season 54 men's basketball tournament. There's no excuse for an actual article to be written about this film with this in mind. Howard the Duck (talk)
Merge to Okay Ka, Fairy Ko! franchise. Nothing found in the Manila Standard except for the award nomination mention. DareshMohan (talk) 18:01, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm interested on how you did this. Searching via Google Newspaper Archive is impossible. You'd have to know what dates you'd browse into and hope a copy is there. Howard the Duck (talk) 01:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Howard the Duck: I did a search for the year 1992. I can link what I found if you want. [1], [2] DareshMohan (talk) 04:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Specific discussion of the amount of reference material available about this subject would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 03:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I'm rather favouring a keep but if this page should be redirected to and merged with another page, it would make more sense to do it with the first film (part I) (Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!: The_Movie) than with the original TV series (Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!).-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:30, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with a merge to the first film. --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:20, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per NFILM, otherwise merge to Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!: The Movie per explanations above. This seems like an appropriate situation for relying on a secondary criterion (here The film has received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking), as most of the possible sources are either offline or difficult to access. -- Visviva (talk) 23:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree with Mushy Yank. A redirect to Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!: The Movie#Sequel would be suitable. DareshMohan (talk) 04:45, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.