Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OYO Rooms (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:19, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OYO Rooms

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since there was not both a clear and populated consensus at the first AfD, it's time to revisit since the article has only been replastered as advertising again and again, the article still, like before the AfD, still looks like an advertisement (see this) which only focuses with advert information such as funding, partnerships, expansions and awards. My own searches and examinations, which I went through pages and pages to find each one (specifically at News and the customized Indian News search engines) but only still found PR-hinting news, news for its funding, partnerships and especially "starting company status" (which the current sources also insinuate). I'm particularly notifying DGG who not only has a history of involvement with these subject AfDs and the specific topic, but also has a history of examining advertisement articles (his comments were also specifically what this article is currently troubled with, the fact this is still questionably notable, regardless of any apparent coverage). SwisterTwister talk 07:51, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:52, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly keep as revised. Just as a demonstration, I removed as much promotional material as possible. There's a plausible claim to notability as leader in its market segment. DGG ( talk ) 19:30, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:06, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Although, the page does appear to need quite some edits, there is no question of notability. Kar.sunder (talk) 02:04, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per the reasons I stated in the first AFD discussion of this article. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:07, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - AfD is not for cleanup. Not the first time. Not the second time. Nevertheless WP:VOLUNTEER DGG has cleaned up the article since this nomination. I hope this doesn't encourage more cleanup nominations. ~Kvng (talk) 17:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.