Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Network Abuse Clearinghouse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:35, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Network Abuse Clearinghouse

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find reference to email abuse and spamming, but nothing to indicate notability for the org/website. The book mentions are just the same as here, confirmation it existed. Has been deleted once (ancient history, pre CSDs) so didn't think PROD appropriate. Star Mississippi 20:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 20:13, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:24, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - an organization that advocates for or against some thing does not inherit notability from the thing. Bearian (talk) 04:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.