Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neogi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Monsters_of_Spelljammer#Neogi. MelanieN (talk) 01:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neogi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources given here are all WP:Primary sources; there doesn't appear to be any discussion of this subject in secondary sources, meaning it may not qualify as bona fide notable. KDS4444^Talk 14:37, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 00:58, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Monsters of Spelljammer. There's no need for a separate article. Indeed, as noted by the nominator, there isn't much to sustain a separate article. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, or merge per NewYorkActuary. BOZ (talk) 02:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Monsters of Spelljammer and I nearly closed it myself as this is likely best connected to the series itself instead of having an independently notable article of its own. SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.