Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neha Rathore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete re-evaluation after listing has produced unanimity.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Neha Rathore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable female boxer. Lacks the coverage to meet the GNG and also fails to meet WP:NBOX. Winning a state amateur championship and being invited to compete at the national amateur championships is not enough to show notability.Mdtemp (talk) 16:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nominator.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per Nom. Seems to be just a piece of promotion. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:09, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Keep~~ I found multiple references to her in national publications and given she's competitive at a national level in a country as populous as India. VanEman (talk) 22:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please list the ones that show significant coverage and not just results? Papaursa (talk) 02:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting this to give @VanEman: an opportunity to provide the sources claimed to exist. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 17:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm not seeing how WP:NBOX is met here. Also not seeing any coverage that would satisfy the general notability guidelines. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Thank you for giving me some time to check out the references I saw. The one that really profiled her was http://www.trendchamp.com/neha-rathore/ , but the others, to Papaursa's point, were really just listings of names and results. Should be a "delete". Thanks for your patience! VanEman (talk) 16:35, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since you now believe the article should be deleted, I have crossed out your keep vote above in an attempt to minimize confusion. Papaursa (talk) 01:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Neither WP:NBOX or WP:GNG is met. Papaursa (talk) 01:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this seems clear, delete since nothing seems convincing to keep and improve. The current article has nothing convincing of better improvements. SwisterTwister talk 04:36, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.