Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nayakuralu Nagamma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is to Keep, I will say however the article is in a piss-poor condition and does need alot of attention, That said notability does seem to be there. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 01:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nayakuralu Nagamma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is not intelligible and has sources but those are not clear. Searches here and here found results but nothing to improve the article. A browser search found this (I'm not sure what it says) and this (which like Books confirms this person has been portrayed in movies). There's simply nothing to improve this article and nothing to significantly support it (at least with English sources). SwisterTwister talk 04:05, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:28, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:16, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep (assuming that it is not a hoax). Since it appears to have some sources, I find it hard to think it is a hoax. If what it says is true, I am most surprised that she has not been a feminist heroine, since medieval stateswomen were few and far between. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 06:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.