Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanogel (insulation)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. listed for 22 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to determine consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Nanogel_(insulation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
The article does not add anything of encyclopedic value. The information posted is general and pertains to any brand of aerogel glass, and should therefore be written under the "uses" section of the aerogel article. The article should be deleted for being commercial and biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OstermannH (talk • contribs) 2010/03/07 09:15:35
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Notability isn't asserted in the current version of the article, however there is some coverage from reliable sources, possibly enough for it to meet the relevant guidelines. Some of the claims need sourcing, but if they are inaccurate they can be removed. Also what you have suggested implies merging to aerogel; if this is your intention, it isn't necessary to nominate the article for deletion (see Wikipedia:Proposed mergers). snigbrook (talk) 20:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 21:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:47, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.