- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 03:07, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- NEC HYDRAstor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advert made up of vendor websites, press releases and other primary sources. CorporateM (Talk) 03:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sources of this article are currently: 8 research papers, 5 professional press releases, 4 vendor websites, 2 independent blog entries. This is quite good proportion, as for article about a commercial product. Vendor sources are cited only as sources of technical details. We have tried to strip the article of anything that could be considered advert, and make it as informative as possible. But it is article about a product, and anything written about a product could be considered advert. Please suggest what changes you think should be done, instead of outright deletion.--AI~plwiki (talk) 07:30, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Can you clarify what you mean by "we"? CorporateM (Talk) 07:54, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Me and Tlasica. We have created this article together. --AI~plwiki (talk) 08:19, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Can you clarify what you mean by "we"? CorporateM (Talk) 07:54, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sources of this article are currently: 8 research papers, 5 professional press releases, 4 vendor websites, 2 independent blog entries. This is quite good proportion, as for article about a commercial product. Vendor sources are cited only as sources of technical details. We have tried to strip the article of anything that could be considered advert, and make it as informative as possible. But it is article about a product, and anything written about a product could be considered advert. Please suggest what changes you think should be done, instead of outright deletion.--AI~plwiki (talk) 07:30, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - Awards appear to make this product notable. Stand-alone article justified under WP:NPRODUCT. ~Kvng (talk) 14:30, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 17:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 17:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.