Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Museum for Northern Peoples

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 18:52, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Museum for Northern Peoples

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Inadequately sourced article about a small, relatively new museum. I am unable to find any sources that discuss the museum in depth. Unless some good sources can be found, the subject seems to fails WP:ORGDEPTH. I originally nominated it for CSD#A7, but another editor objected. - Mr X 02:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. - Mr X 02:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. With the Norwegian name from the no.wikipedia article, Samtidsmuseet for nordlige folk, I was able to find substantial news and other coverage. I've expanded the article a bit and added several references. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:16, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking for sources. As far as I can tell, none of the sources that you added really discuss the subject at any length, and some are mere mentions. Only two would be considered reliable publications ([1] and [2]). - Mr X 04:48, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Per Yngvadottir. Can't see any good reason to delete a verifiable and verified museum article like this.--Arxiloxos (talk) 15:21, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:24, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.