Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs. Fisher's, Inc.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Mrs. Fisher's, Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Only non-trivial reference found after good faith news archive search is feature on company in local ("metropolitan area" population < 300,000) paper. Bongomatic 13:20, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep for now (I'm willing to have my mind changed, though)—it seems to sell a lot of chips, and while I can't find much news coverage either I do at least see lots of those boring "business profile" websites or whatever. I know that kind of stuff isn't mentioned in WP:CORP, but I dunno, I just find that article not that terrible. And it's not vanispamcruftisement, which a lot of these articles often are. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 14:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – two RS, fairly large company, not written as an advertisement (after working on it). TheAE talk/sign 22:25, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep please note that Rockford's metropolitan area is over 350,000, in case that is important to judge the merit of an article about Mrs. Fishers appearing in that city's main newspaper. The company has been around since the 1930's - this is not a start up venture. Also, if an image can be used, the logo for the chips manufacturer would be of interest also. The logo is still very 1930's looking and iconoclastic, at least for people in the upper midwest where the chips are sold. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockford1963 (talk • contribs) 06:45, 19 March 2009
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.