Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mowtowr-e Khodadad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. CSD G14. — The Earwig (talk) 05:31, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mowtowr-e Khodadad

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disambiguates only one extant page. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. 4nn1l2 (talk) 01:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mowtowr-e Khodadad, Khash Again, why do you need to nominate all these for deletion? Just redirect it to the one remaining link on the DAB. Same for all noms made by the nominator on today's log. Please read WP:BURO. Nate • (chatter) 18:57, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Again, the redirect should be the other way round. One should move Mowtowr-e Khodadad, Khash to Mowtowr-e Khodadad which is not possible by non-admins. The AfD is the safe option in which any objection can be heard. If there is no participation by the community within one week, an admin will just soft-close the discussion. 4nn1l2 (talk) 20:09, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Not necessarily; a bot or anyone can relist it without any participation indefinitely. Nate • (chatter) 21:50, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:18, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:12, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only because there's now nothing to disambiguate to, as all the links are red. Nom should have done a lot more work so we wouldn't have to waste time here on AfD. Someone close this, please. Nate • (chatter) 02:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - since there are now zero blue links, I've nominated it for G14 speedy deletion. Once that's taken care of, this can be closed. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.