Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mountain View Cur (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:21, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain View Cur

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was previously AfD but nomination was withdrawn - however the only source I can find besides the Sarah's Dogs page is a passing mention in this book and numerous personal kennel pages. Seems to me that this is yet one more example of "putting my WP:MADEUP dog breed on wikipedia makes it legitimate." TKK ^{bark !} 14:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sarah, your dog is just not notable, sorry. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 14:40, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:46, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 14:46, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doing a standard WP:SET it reveals mostly user submitted content (blogs, tripods websites, youtube) and in books and news it seems that their local newspaper wrote a story on their dog and that's it. Does not meet WP:GNG with multiple independent and reliable sources. No credible claim of notability. Mkdw ^talk 06:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:32, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 02:05, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It seems that the article's main author is involved with WP:SPS and also article does not meet general notability guideline. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 03:47, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unsourced, can't seem to find anything reliable that would indicate notability. 03:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdventurousSquirrel (talk • contribs) 03:50, 3 February 2013‎

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.