Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montessori De Manila
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:20, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Montessori De Manila (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. The article violates WP:OR and WP:PROMOTION. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES states that "Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist." —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:50, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete There's zero references in the article and all I could find is a couple of name drops in school directories and research paper. Nothing in-depth that directly discusses the school though. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:03, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Powerful Karma (talk) 14:48, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.