- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:59, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Monica Queen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable artist in her own right. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 10:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The articles in the Sunday Mail (cited), Metro, and The List (reproduced on her website) mean that she is notable. She has also released two albums, one on Creeping Bent. Her previous band, Thrum, is certainly notable, even if there isn't an article here yet. Thrum has a bio and discography in Martin C. Strong's The Great Indie Discography, and half of that bio is about Monica Queen's solo career. Further coverage from the BBC, The Herald.--Michig (talk) 12:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Significant coverage from reliable sources. I didn't even know the subject until I saw this AFD. However, this is a weak, WP:Not notable deletion nomination that didn't do the 3 seconds of research required to instantly disprove the claim. Under, "Find Sources," above, one need only make that hard effort of clicking on 'News,' and maybe if you're feeling extra helpful, 'Books,' to see that this nomination should never have been made. Please don't clutter AFD with these in the future. Vodello (talk) 01:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Hardly any of the results generated by looking at the 'News' or 'Books' links refer to the person that this article is about. Of those that do, most only mention her in passing. The refs provided by Michig are good ones, though. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 08:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I've put more references in the article. Has significant coverage from reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.