Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohamad Abdul Tayyab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:23, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamad Abdul Tayyab

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Multiple searches found simply nothing about the subject not there's much about him to help search but I tried and only found this at Books. A thoughtful search at Google Scholar found nothing and I'm unable to find the ISCI (not sure what this stands for and searches found nothing) magazine reference so it may be offline, so unfortunately there's not much to the article at this time. SwisterTwister talk 04:53, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Found nothing that supports claim of notability Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:50, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I couldn't find enough evidence that the reference listed for this article, "ISCI Magazine", even exists (e.g. the first hit on Google is this article, there are only 12 hits, and most or all seem to be about unrelated things with the same name). So I think this fails verifiability, let alone notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:45, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.