Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchell S. Steir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:06, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mitchell S. Steir

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject may not meet our notability requirements. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:13, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: Despite a lack of enthusiast for this kind of guy-with-a-job biography, I feel the two New York Times articles referenced in the article - one a profile, the other an interview - seem sufficient to demonstrate some biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 15:48, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'd haver to agree with you AllyD on this one. Though he is just a real estate broker, the references on the page (like the New York Times) are reliable and prove he is notable. Meatsgains (talk) 00:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Relisting comment: Daniel (talk) 00:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.