Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Supranational 2017

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 19:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Supranational 2017

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As other years of this pageant have been deleted via AfD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Supranational (2nd nomination)), the following should also. All the sources are basically local news reporting on the country's delegate. The yearly events themselves do not seem to have notability besides pageant spotters.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 18:31, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:41, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Supranational 2016 I'd like to add this article to this discussion. I deleted it due to a previous AFD decision and was asked by an editor to restore it and add this year to the current AFD discussion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - failed to meet WP:GNG.---Richie Campbell (talk) 01:38, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This is one of the notable major beauty contests of the year. It has reliable and diverse sources meet WP:GNG. This is evidenced in part by the 12,435 page views in the last 20 days, much higher than the two of big 4, Miss International 2021 and the two most recent editions of Miss Earth, 2020 and 2021. Bonutra (talk) 6:00, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- The 2019 edition of three, Miss Supranational also reached 8.322 page views in the last 30 days is also higher than Miss International and Miss Earth. Bonutra (talk) 6:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep The deletion is from 2014, when the contest was only held 4 times, it has been 12 years now and become much more notable since. That claim about sources is also strictly untrue, so much that proving it is trivial: here are references from just the 2017 article, but the others are likewise. I suspect the nominator didn't really look at them.
- https://beautypageants.indiatimes.com/miss-supranational/jenny-kim-from-korea-crowned-miss-supranational-2017/articleshow/61887341.cms?from=mdr India Times, major newspaper from India writing about Korea winning
- https://www.visitseychelles.org/global-travel-news/korean-beauty-jenny-kim-crowned-miss-supranational-2017/ Site from Seychelles with the same story
- https://beautypageants.indiatimes.com/miss-supranational/yuki-koshikawa-crowned-miss-supranational-japan-2017/articleshow/58572537.cms?from=mdr India Times writing about the Japan contest preliminary
- https://www.twojakrynica.pl/aktualnosci/miss-supranational-2017-mister-supranational-2017-miss-polski-2017-krynicy/
- https://www.polsat.pl/news/2017-11-21/zobacz-gorace-fotki-finalistek-miss-supranational-2017/ 2 different Polish sites writing about the contest (which Poland did not win) --GRuban (talk) 14:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Bonutra and GRuban citations. All of Indonesian representatives to the Miss Supranational pageant even supported by the governments and each year, Miss Supranational Indonesia appear on Government Website. Means Miss Supranational is a notable major beauty contests.--Lukewon (talk) 05:57, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - noting the following AfDs that are related: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Miss_and_Mister_Supranational and Mister Supranational 2021. Atsme 💬 📧 16:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss and Mister Supranational decision was to keep this article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.