- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:33, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Miss Arab USA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. DownAndUp (talk) 01:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 August 10. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Beauty pageants, and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 09:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Rationale from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mrs. International (pageant): "Since this is essentially an event run by a commercial organization, the appropriate guideline is WP:NCORP. [References] focus either on the contestants (past and present) and their "causes" or opinions or is based on PR/Announcements. Most of the references have no "Independent Content" as per WP:ORGIND as the content is provided by affiliated sources and the rest fail WP:CORPDEPTH as trivial content." "Sources provided mainly only reference the organization as existing and mostly talk about whatever contestant they're highlighting. Confirmation that it exists is not notability." DownAndUp (talk) 04:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Conducted a search of Newspapers.com and perused the existing sources. Unless this pageant has some alternate names of which I am ignorant, there's nothing independent. [1] is fairly deep on the organization itself but not independent, and certainly not WP:NORG-level stuff. Ovinus (talk) 00:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.