Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milky Haven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete‎. Speedily deleted by User:Justlettersandnumbers as unambiguous advertising or promotion. (non-admin closure) Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Milky Haven

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable dairy company, heavy in puffery and promotional language. All references except one (which is also not independent of the subject) are to the company's website; was also unable to find any independent sources that are about this company. There are some for a dairy company of the same name in Pennsylvania which doesn't have an article, but none for this company. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 09:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Companies. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 09:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: most of the references are the company's official website, a non reliable source. I Don't think this article is objective and neutral enough to be on Wikipedia. EncyclopediaEditorXIV (talk) 14:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: G11. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 10:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not saying you're wrong, but I thought about nominating the article for G11 but decided not to because there is a controversy section and not every sentence includes promotional language. I could nom it for G11 now if you think it is necessary, and I would've if this article was 2 days old instead of 20, though I guess age is not really a criterion for G11. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 10:58, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Full of Promotional, G11 applies here. GrabUp - Talk 10:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: WP:G11 applies, this is heavily promotional with no evidence of any notability guidelines being met here. Let'srun (talk) 12:47, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Per WP:G11. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 12:48, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. Per nom. Page reads as promotion and advertising. WP:PROMO. RangersRus (talk) 12:54, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Per nominator and WP:G11, it looks like the page is written as an advertisement. Normanhunter2 (talk) 13:28, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tamil Nadu-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:13, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No WP:SIGCOV in reliable third-party online sources. The results of an internet search are mostly from self-published sources. Prof.PMarini (talk) 05:32, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Definitely reads like an advertisement and WP:G11 should apply here. Waqar💬 17:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Totally promotional article about a diary producing company or thereabout, created by a new editor after escaping the AFC process. The sources are blogs by the company, and the body reads like advert. Such article needs salting to avoid recreation, which may be the latter one day. Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:53, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.