Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Patrick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 03:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Patrick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Feel like this needs more than PROD. He's a practicing attorney who has been frequently mentioned in the press, but there's no evidence any of the coverage is in depth or about it. His highest profile case appears to be one to which he contributed an amicus brief, rather than took an active part in litigation. Note: he is not the Michael Patrick who is the Hofstra Dean. StarM 21:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. StarM 21:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. StarM 21:03, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.