Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Olmsted (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deleting, despite efforts, it appears the subject fails WP:BASE. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 19:12, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Olmsted (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Kept at the previous AfD in part on the assumption he passed WP:NBASE for playing for the Fukuoka Softbank Hawks, Olmstead is not listed as having appeared for the team in either 2009, 2010 or 2011 (or at all, but these are the relevant years). Briefly topped out at the AAA level, tagged as potentially not notable since 2018, and the only significant coverage is a local, routine story from a town he played minor league ball in. Already fails the WP:10YT without even needing to wait a decade - not a notable baseball prospect. SportingFlyer T·C 07:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--Adamant1 (talk) 09:47, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • None of those sources demonstrate any level of notability and simply demonstrate he played minor league ball in Japan. This shows he played three games in the Western League, which is effectively the Triple-A for the Japanese league. Everything else is transactional or routine. SportingFlyer T·C 09:58, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 07:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 07:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 07:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.