Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Huemer (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yash talk stalk 05:41, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Huemer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted in 2006, re-created by an editor with a WP:COI. I think this gent fails WP:PROF. The article as I found it was extensively referenced to WP:PRIMARY sources - "reviewed on libertarian website X, source, review on libertarian website X" - plus blogs and other unreliable sources. In the end, nothing to indicate a major body of scholarship with a reputation in the field. Guy (Help!) 12:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. StarryGrandma (talk) 23:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Review: The Problem Of Political Authority: An Examination Of The Right To Coerce And The Duty To Obey By Huemer, Michael
Reviewed Work: The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey by Huemer, Michael
Review by: George Klosko
Ethics, Vol. 124, No. 2 (January 2014), pp. 412-417
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
DOI: 10.1086/673423
Stable URL: link

MICHAEL HUEMER: Ethical Intuitionism
Michael Huemer, Ethical Intuitionism, Palgrave Macmillan, 2006, 309pp., $85.00 (hbk), ISBN 1403989680.
Reviewed by David McNaughton, Florida State University )link
Sufficient library holdings for multiple books as well. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.