Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mia Eve Rollow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:50, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mia Eve Rollow

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. When I searched, I found nothing but passing mentions of this woman, nothing in-depth. I did find one article from the Southern Maryland chronicle about her winning an award, but the article most of the article about her and there was nowhere near enough content to satisfy WP:SIGCOV. She is simply not notable. Helen(💬📖) 23:25, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 23:45, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 23:45, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 23:45, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this one is a bit tricky as she and her collaborators are working in decentralized groups that do not necessarily generate process for the members. She co-founded EDELO, which might be notable and worth of a standalone article, but I am not seeing enough material to make her notable under her own name. it seems like the same situation with her EDELO co-founder, Caleb Duarte. --- Possibly ☎ 02:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A quick check of Google with Books "on" turns up a chapter in Collective Situations: Readings in Contemporary Latin American Art, 1995–2010 edited by Bill Kelley Jr., Grant H. Kester (2017) (the editor both discusses and interviews Caleb Duarte; they both reference Rollow's work) and a 2 page discussion in Black Power Afterlives: The Enduring Significance of the Black Panther Party edited by Diane Fujino, Matef Harmachis (2020). Checking for "news" returns some coverage of art installations in Germany. That's the results of a trivial check in English, without doing any serious digging. Since not all of their work is done under the name EDELO, I would favor keeping two separate pages. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 05:07, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mary Mark Ockerbloom:, the book chapter is, as you mention, an interview titled "interview with Caleb Duarte of EDELO Residency", so it is primarily not about her and also not an independent source. Having her collaborator mention her in print does not have value notability-wise. Regarding the Black Power Afterlives source, I cannot see it. Could you share roughly what it says? --- Possibly ☎ 05:24, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No enough WP:SIGCOV to pass notability threshold. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:39, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – EDELA itself has generated a bit of coverage (and thus could be notable on its own), but none of that coverage seems to discuss Rollow in any detail. A few single-sentence trivial mentions don't help, nor do comments by her colleagues. If in-depth coverage can be identified I'll gladly reevaluate, but what I'm finding isn't enough to meet the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.